Coombes Farm 2 - New Application submitted (23rd December)

Iceni have slipped a fresh planning application in to concrete over Coombes Farm today, just as peoples' attentions are focused on more festive matters!

I haven't seen the full details yet, but I have to wonder what their game plan is.

The Core Strategy, Rochford's local development plan, was formally adopted by the Council last week and this should rule out any development at Coombes Farm for at least the next 15 years.

If Iceni wish to pursue their plans to concrete over Coombes Farm they will have to successfully challenge the Core Strategy in the High Court and they have until the 24th January 2012 to lodge an appeal.

However, at the same time, they have to follow the planning process which means the new application will be considered by Rochford's Planning Committee and will, in all likelihood, be refused. This, however, isn't likely to happen for at least a couple of months, passing the deadline to appeal against the Core Strategy.

I guess they may adopt an assault on two fronts and consider High Court action against the Core Strategy simultaneously to following the conventional planning route to try and urbanise Coombes Farm.

Basically, yet another long legal battle commences...

Cherry Tree remains the perfect destination

A year ago Rochford was covered in snow, and The Cherry Tree was the perfect refuge against the winter elements, the ideal destination for a superb meal in warm, historic and friendly surroundings. This year, no snow, but "The Cherry Tree" continues in much the same tradition under new owners Amanda and Dan.

That said, it was explained to me that plans to broaden The Cherry Tree's appeal are afoot. More to follow in this regard, but anyone who is looking for the quintessential English Inn serving extremely high quality food in a comfortable environment will find the answer here.

Click on the title for a copy of their Christmas menu. They also have an a la carte menu and a decent wine list and are now open all day.

Contact number is 01702 544426.

Musings December 2011

Rochford looks set to begin 2012 by building on its burgeoning reputation as South East Essex's new dining and drinking destination.

"Alessandro's" at 64/66 West Street (previously "Arthy's") has applied for a drinks licence and looks set to open as an Italian wine bar/restaurant in January. More details to follow.

In the past six months or so we've seen The Rose Garden Restaurant open above The Miley in Union Lane, followed a month ago by Rochford's first bistro pub, The Grey Goose, and the latest venture,"Baroques" at the bottom of West Street looks virtually ready to open.

This boost to Rochford's night economy will be welcome by many, although there will be concerns about whether there is enough "money to go round" and the impact on Rochford's more established boozers. Judging by the sudden increase in parked up cars along East Street near The Grey Goose, it seems people are driving in from the surrounding area, which can only be good news.

Finally, Coombes Farm or "Land South of Stambridge Road" is currently all quiet. As I write, no planning application has been submitted but when it is, activity will commence. It's obvious the strength of feeling towards this housing scheme remains as strong as before so Iceni can rest assured that Rochford is ready and prepared!

D-Day for Hall Road

Plans to build 600 houses on land adjacent to Hall Road and Oak Road will go before Council on 18th January 2012.

In addition to the new homes, Bellway Homes have included a new primary school, new cycle and footpaths and a public "open space" - whatever that means.

There will be two access points to the new estate, one involving the construction of a new roundabout along Hall Road.

This is a preferred development site and is included in the Council's recently Government sanctioned Development plan or "core strategy".

But the land is green belt, and coupled with the prospect of increased traffic congestion and the increased strain on local infrastructure, this will not be welcome news for many residents.

More details can be found on the Council's website, including how you can attend the Council meeting where this application will be decided. You can access this by clicking on the title of this post.

With "Christmas Tree Farm" in Hawkwell being decided just before christmas (see post below) and Hall Road just after, you have to wonder at the timing of two of the District's most significant, and substantial, new housing schemes - both on greenbelt - for many years.

Christmas Tree Farm's Last Christmas (Updated 7th & 16th December)

Plans to build an estate of 176 houses in Hawkwell on land near Rectory Road and Main Road will go before Council on 15th December (UPDATE: Planning Officers are recommending approval). A slightly larger scheme was rejected last year, but this area has been earmarked as a site for development in the Council's core strategy, despite it being designated green belt.

Click on title to read Officers' recommendation in full.

UPDATE: 16th December - Councillors refused the planning application, largely due to concerns over design including garden size. Expect to see a revised application in the new year.

Baroque - Another new bar. Discussion

I'd be interested in comments on the prospect of another Bar opening next month.

You may have noticed the rapid transformation of the old car showroom at the bottom of West Street into "Baroque" a bar/club that surely will be targeting the younger generation who have have, up to now, generally headed straight into Southend or Leigh for their entertainment.

They plan to open before christmas and are interviewing for new staff on Thursday, 24th November.

Will the Bar enrich Rochford's night economy? Provide an alternative from the existing pubs? Or do you think it may spread Rochford's already strained spending power too thinly? Or if you have any other comments, it would be good to get a healthy debate going.

Southend Airport progress

Aerial photos taken a couple of months ago showing clearly the quick progress being made.

courtesy of "wannabe pilot" from aviation forum

Rochford's stylish new venue

We popped in to Rochford's newest drinking and eating venue last night and were very impressed. A modern, stylish bar with pleasant, smiling staff, and a restaurant area to the rear and on the first floor. The menu, with a daily specials board, offered a truly lip smacking range of European dishes covering all tastes.

The Owners explained that tea and coffee will always be readily available, a lunch menu will complement the evening menu, in all ensuring a busy destination throughout the day.

This really raises the "bar" for the Rochford area, and will definitely be a shot in the arm for the local economy. Whilst it's a venue in itself, I can also see the local Indian and Chinese Restaurants benefiting as visitors will choose "The Grey Goose" as the perfect Rendezvous point.

Their website (click on the title of this post to link) includes details of their lunch and dinner menu.

Rochford Square - traffic flow measures

Essex County Council has authorised a swap in exit and entry points to the Square to improve traffic flow in West Street. The measure will be accompanied by a beefing up of the "No Stopping Zones". Presumably, the aim is to reduce the frequent queuing of traffic, waiting for a parking space in the Square. Currently traffic is often blocked or restricted, in particular buses entering the Square, sometimes to such an extent that traffic flow along South/North and East Streets is affected.

Wasn't this the previous arrangement for entering and leaving the Square?

Anything that helps the situation must be welcome I guess, but if the present arrangement had simply been enforced, surely we wouldn't need any changes?

Coombes Farm 2

Iceni's fresh attempt to concrete over Coombes Farm prompted a great show of familiar faces last night as the "new" plans were displayed at the College in Rocheway.

Posters were handed out asking why, if Councillors, Planning Inspectors, and Residents had all said "No" to previous attempts to build, Iceni were trying again.

Cynically presented as a different scheme and even re-named "Land South of Stambridge Road", representatives from Iceni were left with no illusion about the undiminished strength of feeling against any plans to build.

The Council has ruled out any development at Coombes Farm for at least the next 15 years in their local development plan (its "core strategy"). These plans have now been endorsed by a Government Planning Inspector, so Iceni would have to mount a successful Judicial Review to overturn the core strategy to stand any chance of success. I don't however doubt for a moment that they will try, given their past threats of legal action at every stage of the planning process.

This Blog will detail all aspects of the residents campaign to save Coombes Farm.

Once a planning application is submitted it is likely a residents meeting will be arranged to establish a common approach to fighting the proposals. This time, it would be great to get even more people involved including some of our younger residents.

The Concreting Over of Rochford

I'm very worried about how Rochford will look in just a few years time as Developers line up with immediate plans for well over 1000 houses in the area, many of which will be on green belt.

The Government has failed to allay fears that new planning legislation will retain protection for the Green Belt, as it contains an overriding "presumption in favour of growth".

It's increasingly obvious that this is the Government's plan to stimulate growth. Build. Build. Build. Who can afford to buy all these homes, and what mortage funding will be available appears to be a question that will be addressed at a later date.

Within Rochford area the following schemes look likely to go before Planning Commitee within the next few months;

Hall Road - 600 houses
Rectory Road/Thorpe Road, Hawkwell - 175 houses
Stambridge Mill - 100 homes
Brays Lane - 100 houses (already agreed provisionally)
Coombes Farm (Stambridge Rd) - 260 houses

All these sites, except Stambridge Mill, are green belt designated.

The Council is an invidious position. Central Government forces Local Councils to produce Local Development Plans that demonstrate that a supposed future demand for housing can be met.

Rochford has extremely limited land left for development, and has been forced to surrender some green belt to comply with Government demands. Of course, Developers also prefer green belt as it provides a blank canvas and avoids expensive demolition and redevelopment costs.

Yet, if the Council doesn't produce a plan, it leaves itself open to Developers taking control of the planning agenda. With deep pockets for top ranking Barristers, costs which Local Authorities can ill afford to match, Developers can often successfully use the Legal System to get the outcome they want, a new housing estate of ticky tacky houses on land which was often previously cherished by the neighbourhood.

I learn today that the Council's Core Strategy (its Local Development Plan) has finally been approved by the Government and will formally be adopted by the Council in December.

This should help to defend against development schemes not forming part of the Council's plans, however most of the schemes listed above ARE included in the Development Plan.

I wish I could conclude this post on a positive note, but right now I can't help but think of a future where Southend and Rochford increasingly merge into one urbanised mass.

East Community Forum 18th October

I attended the first re-formatted Community Forum this week, an opportunity for Residents to learn more about what is happening in their area and meet their Councillors. There was also representation from local PCTs (primary care trusts) and the Police. Whilst the theme of the evening was "budgets" and the Leader of the Council, Terry Cutmore, invited questions from the audience on any aspects of the Council's spending plans, he also made it clear that questions on any subject were welcome.

In their previous incarnation, the Community Forums were arranged formally, such that the Councillors sat behind a row of tables, and questions ideally needed to be submitted prior to the meeting.

Whilst "special guest" attendees from the PCTs, and the Police, joined the Leader and Chief Executive of the Council at the top table, the local District and Parish Councillors sat with the residents. More importantly, questions could be raised at the meeting, and the intention was to answer them, as far as possible, there and then.

Funnily enough, no questions were raised about the Council's budgets. I guess, unsurprisingly, no one has studied the budgets in detail or no one present was affected by the consequences of some of the cut backs. Maybe when the West Community Forum takes place, residents from Great Wakering may have a thing or two to say about the closure of the Sports Centre for example.

Policing, however, was a popular subject.

Questions were raised about anti social behaviour in Hockley, in particular the nuisance caused by members of one family. It was interesting to note that the Police appeared to be well aware of the situation and visited the family daily to "harrass" them, at the same time gathering evidence. The Hockley Councillor advised that an eviction order was imminent.

Parking issues also caused the temperature in the room to rise significantly, in particular selfish parking where pavements are partially blocked. The Police advised that they generally only got involved if the offender's parking was dangerous, the vehicle potentially blocking ambulance access or parking on a blind corner. Otherwise, it is usually a Council matter.

In Rochford, concerns were raised by the imminent departure of a popular PC, Stuart Goldsack, who has helped reduce incidents of anti social behaviour in the Square by positively engaging with the youngsters responsible. We were told that Stuart's replacement has already been appointed by a volunteer for the role, and we were assured he was of a similar calibre.

Moving away from Policing, Tracey Chapman, Essex County Council Head of Transport, responded to a question on pot holes. She explained that they are graded according to severity, the most serious gaining the most urgent attention whilst those causing the least problems may be left until their condition deteriorated to the next grade level.

Representatives from the PCTs had a fairly quiet night. Questions were raised about Southend Hospital's new electronic "check in" system and we were assured that improvements had already taken place plus more staff had been made available to offer help.

I asked about an increase in noise and pollution from Purdeys Industrial Estate. Litter covers the footpath from Watts Lane to Stambridge Mill, apparently straying over from Purdeys. The noise levels seem to have increased recently, from a number of sources. The Council's paid Chief Excutive, Paul Warren, said he would investigate.

No questions were asked about the Council's plans for the future - its core strategy, improvements (or changes depending on how you see it) to the Square, Southend Airport, etc. Still, there will be an opportunity at the next Forum in the New Year.

Finally, news of the forum was delivered to every household in the District through the "Rochford Matters" newspaper. Further, it has been highlighted on the Council's website. I found it to be a very interesting event, and something I understand the Council is not required to hold.

So sad then that only approx 12 residents turned up on the night.

Do we not care about our District?

Another new bar for Rochford and planning news (Updated 30th Sept)

With the pub trade suffering, and many of Rochford's bars empty through the week, it may be surprising to learn that two new bars/restaurants are likely to open before christmas.

At 68-72 West Street, opposite the Marlborough Head, and at the corner of Union Lane, a Government Inspector has recently overturned local Councillors' refusal to grant permission to convert the existing disused car showroom into a bar/restaurant (The Councillors went against the Council's planning officers, who recommended approval back in April 2011).

Work is already underway, and the Owners expect to be trading before Christmas.

There is only so much spare cash to go round, so it will be interesting to see if this new venue can differentiate its offering without sucking the limited business away from nearby pubs.

Separately, the New Ship's refurbishment (East Street, Rochford, opposite the "Taste of Raj") appears complete and I'm told more news about opening date, and offering will be available within the next month.

UPDATE: I walked past the New Ship this morning and a notice in the window invites applications for Bar Staff, Waiting Staff, Cleaners, and Commis Chefs - drop a CV in or telephone 01702 544797.

Turning to other planning news, this month the Council gave outline permission for 100 houses at Brays Lane, Rochford. This scheme is likely to proceed quickly unless the Government decides to intervene.

No news yet when Stambridge Mill will go before Planning Committee, but full demolition of the existing structures could take place very soon.

Rochford's revised core strategy (its development plan for the area for the next 10 - 15 years) is now likely to submitted to a Government Planning Inspector in October and, assuming no final hitches, could well be in place by Christmas. Rochford's approach contrasts starkly with nearby Castle Point, which has decided, for now, to abandon attempts to get a development plan in place.

The point of the Core Strategy is that it provides a Council with control over where development in its locality will take place, as controversial as some upcoming schemes may be. Castle Point's approach means that housing schemes will be decided on a case by case basis, and Developers will undoubtedly exploit what they see as a weakness in the decision not to get a plan in place.

Call me a cynic, but Castle Points' decision may well be politically motivated. When Government Planning Inspectors overrule a planning refusal to tarmac greenbelt land at Daws Heath, local Councillors can pin the blame at Whitehall.

I'm glad Rochford hasn't adopted this approach with the core strategy, although I have little doubt there are a number of individual schemes which Councillors refuse in the knowledge they are likely to be agreed on appeal. In fact, the new West Street bar/diner mentioned above is perhaps such an example.

Brays lane - 100 houses planned

The Council is holding an extra planning meeting next week to vote on plans for a housing development near The King Edmund School at Brays Lane. Full info can be viewed by clicking on the Title Post. An application for 150 homes was submitted last year, but withdrawn. The site is on green belt, but the Council believes there are exceptional reasons why planning permission should be granted. See also my post from 9th July 2010.
EDIT: This Application has since been approved

Southend to Salisbury by steam

Not a post about Rochford, but I know that many local residents were on board for a one off steam train journey from Southend Central to Salisbury on Wednesday 31st August. Averaging 30mph, but with occasional spurts above 75mph, we were hauled by a 60 year old locomotive called Britannia along the c2c line to Barking, then diverting round the North London line, and eventually joining the main South West line near Feltham. The loco, famous for pulling George VI's funeral train in 1952, has been fully restored, and re-entered service this year. It hauled a hotch potch of ancient rolling stock ranging from old "standard" second class to full silver serviced pullman class, complete with fine dining and champagne (the closest we got was oggling through the window - too expensive). The journey took four and a half hours each way and, apart from a short delay due to a signal failure at Basingstoke, ran to time. The take up appeared to be close to 100%, and it was great to see so many onlookers, some looking more surprised than others, along the route. When we pulled into Southend at 10pm, the final destination, a crowd of youngsters did not seem to notice that it wasn't the usual type of loco and rolling stock that runs between Fenchurch Street and Shoebury these days, and couldn't understand why they couldn't board for Shoebury! Steam Dreams, the company that runs the services known as "Cathedral Expresses" plan further trips from Southend, the next being Winchester on 10th December.

Rochford forced to build more houses more quickly?

The Government Inspector's refusal this week to the Council's request to suspend its core strategy until December places Rochford under greater pressure to agree more house building schemes.

When the Coalition Government announced its Localism Bill, it gave Councils the opportunity to review the annual housing targets foisted upon them by central Government. Rochford reduced its annual requirement from 250 units to 190 (though the total numbers remained the same as the annual build was spread over a longer period). Unfortunately for Rochford, and other Councils, various legal actions have found that it was illegal to change annual house building targets until the Localism Bill becomes fully effective. Coupled with the Coalitions's desire to free up the planning process, and for the country to "plan for growth" it is looking increasingly likely that Rochford will be under pressure to build more, not less.

Rochford's core strategy, its development plan for the district, which includes its housing commitments, has been significantly delayed due to the change of Government and advice from central Government which was successfully challenged in the High Court (above). It decided recently to suspend the Core Strategy until December when, it believed, it could take advantage of new legislation (the Localism Bill) which would free it from centrally imposed targets. The Government Inspector, overseeing the progess of the Core Strategy has, however, declined the Council's request to delay and she has given it two choices, either to withdraw its Strategy altogether or to continue but make a firm and early commitment to address the housing shortfall. In effect, if choosing the latter path, the Council may feel it has a "get out of jail card" because it can get its Core Strategy in place with the lower annual housing numbers. They will then look to the Localism Bill to enable them, in the early review required by the Inspector, to try to avoid making any changes to its plans. However, the same Bill, whilst apparently giving Council more freedom, will also give Developers more ammunition to challenge Councils if planning schemes are refused under the planning for growth clauses.

The Council will meet on 31st August to discuss their preferred route forward.

It looks as though Rochford's green belt will be under continuing and increasing threat with the Coalition, surely not what the Electorate thought when casting their vote. The Coalition promised, in their campaigning literature, to return decison making to local Councils as they were in the best position to know what the local area wanted. The reality is looking to be something quite different.

UPDATE 23rd August 2011
Council Officers have recommended that Rochford Council reverts to an earlier version of the core strategy, and submits this for Government approval. Whilst this will force the Government to build more houses more quickly - 250 pa instead of the 190 pa proposed in the later version - the rationale is that the Council will have more control over new housing sites. By having a development plan in place, sanctioned by Government, Developers will have less likelihood of succeeding in legal challenges to build on non preferred sites (eg Coombes Farm). Click on the title to see the Officers' Proposals for debate at a full Council meeting on 31st August.

UPDATE 1st September 2011
Majority vote to revert to earlier version of core strategy.

Stambridge Mill planning application goes in

After much speculation, a formal planning application to redevelop Stambridge Mill has finally been submitted to the Council. In what is a significant scale down of original plans, the intention is to build 45 houses plus a total of 51 flats across four blocks up to three storey in height. Originally, there was talk of approx 250 units at this site, so the reduction to a total of 96 marks a sharp reduction in numbers. This is probably due to the economic climate, although some will question whether this leaves open the option for further development in the future.

This has been a challenging project for Inner London Group, the owner, which has seen a number of architectural revisions aside from the number of units proposed. Not only will it involve the bulldozing of most of the existing Mill structures (though parts will be retained), the scheme also requires a significant investment in the flood defences on this river front site, as well as associated landscaping works, including the bridle path, bridge, communal spaces and the river frontage itself.

ILG will be focused on making a return on their 4 year old investment. They acquired the 4.1 acre site in 2007, paying £1.8million to previous owners, Associated British Food (Allied Mills).

The Council originally wanted to retain the site for industrial/employment use, but changed planning permission approx two years ago to allow the possibility of residential development.

The reduction in units, if this is the total planned, will offer some relief to nearby residents, though there will be objections due to the increased pressure it will place on the local road network and utilities.

There is no news yet whether ILG will hold a community event to display their plans, but the Council are broadly in support of the scheme, not least because it saves the tax payer the expense of urgent remedial work of the ageing flood defences.

This Blog will be following this project as it progresses.

Rose Garden Restaurant - Fine Dining comes to Rochford

Sumptuous food, fine wine, super surroundings - not normally a description you would instantly associate with Rochford's dining options. But for those of us who feel that our area has been left off the food map, a new arrival may just be the emphatic answer to our prayers. Although The Rose Garden, located above "The Miley" in Union Lane (click on title of post for link to website) is not strictly a new restuarant, rather it has relocated from Hockley after protracted planning battles. Still Hockley's loss is our gain. I'm told that it wasn't unusual to have to book 3 months' ahead at times to secure a table and after visiting last night, I can see why.
The menu (accessible from their website) provides a choice of European dishes, including Vegetarian. We opted for Beef Wellington and Monkfish. Quite simply, it was one of the best meals we have enjoyed in Rochford, and sadly left us too sated to enjoy the famous dessert menu.
Sunday lunches are also likely to prove successful, along with a monthly "Curry" night.
Whilst located above a popular local Bar, you could easily imagine you were somewhere else with the modern dining furniture and white painted brick walls, and soft relaxing music playing in the background.
This is going to be a very popular Restaurant, and we'll defnitely be returning shortly.

Opportunities for Rochford?

The big question is, will the substantial increase in noise that the Airport will undoubtedly cause to many residents in Rochford be worth it? Whilst many, myself included, will relish the prospect of being a few minutes way from boarding a plane to sunnier climes, I suspect many more will never use the airport and/or despair of the thought of the prospect of twenty first century passenger aircraft shattering the relative peace over the mediaeval heart of Rochford.

Over the past year or so a number of businesses have closed up in Rochford. First it was the two estate agents in West Street and then in the past few months we have lost a shoe shop, an art and photography business, and a bookshop. Whilst it is only fair to note that some new businesses have opened, they are sadly outnumbered by the shuttered windows. The pub trade is also suffering, with the Kings Head and the Rose and Crown on the market, though both are still trading.

Perhaps what is happening in Rochford is only a reflection of what is happening nationally. Wilkins Kennedy, the Accountancy Firm reported this week that retail insolvencies had jumped by 25% after all.

But if people are travelling to and from Southend Airport, will they be tempted to spend some time, and more importantly, money, in Rochford?

There are some interesting shops, there are a few places to eat, and there is even a small hotel. Rochford, generally, is an architectural gem of a small town, mostly easy on the eye and a pleasant surprise for many visitors. It wouldn't take much to start putting the town seriously on the map.

This Blog is pleased to note that entrepeneurs are already recognizing that Rochford does indeed present an opportunity. A new Restaurant "The Rose Garden" opened upstairs in "The Miley" this week, and we can expect the "New Ship" to reopen shortly as a restaurant/bar after an extensive refurbishment project nears completion and this building on East Street is returned to its former glory.

Whilst retaining its identity, Rochford easily has the ability to offer visitors a place where they genuinely wish to stay a while and spend time and money, perhaps even to stay for an evening through a modest expansion of the night time economy.

Good luck to the new Businesses, we wish you every success, and look forward to other positive new developments.

Coombes Farm Saved

We have today been advised that Colonnade have withdrawn their appeal against the planning refusal at Coombes Farm. Technically, there are now no current oustanding planning matters at Coombes Farm and if Colonnade, or another developer, want to try again they will have to start afresh. The Council is adamant that, apart from Stambridge Mill, it does not want any significant house building in this area so let us hope that today's decision is a harbinger for a positive final resolution.

Why did Colonnade withdraw their appeal? My view is that it was a combination of three factors, national - a High Court decision (Cala Homes)recently has not helped their case, local - the Council have taken steps to avoid their core strategy being found unsound which helps to ensure Colonnade haven't got another hole to exploit, and thirdly, by avoiding the risk of a further refusal, they are perhaps in a better position if they want to try again. Given all above, I would be surprised if we see any activity for some time however.

I'm sure this will come back in the future, but for now, we can take a breather!

Castle Point's core strategy is flawed

Click on title to see article from Evening Echo.
In a worrying development, with ramifications for Rochford, a Planning Inspector has asked Castle Point to go back to the drawing board and effectively come up with more green belt land to be released, to meet house building targets over the next 15 years. These targets were laid down by the East of England Plan, a Regional Strategy, which will be abolished by soon to be introduced legislation. Green Belt land in Daws Heath is looking particularly vulnerable. If the Council doesn't quickly come up with revised plans which are acceptable to the Planning Inspectorate it runs the risk of losing control of which sites are developed to pushy house builders, who will use their considerable financial muscle to push their projects through with legal action if necessary. Either way, it looks as though Castle Point will have to sacrifice land we all thought was protected to avoid such over development. Rochford is facing the same dilemma and the next few months will potentially see planning decisions made which will significantly alter the make up of the District forever.

High Court ruling helps Coombes Farm ..a little

The High Court yesterday (Cala Homes vs Government) ruled that that Planning Inspectors can, on occasion, take into account that Regional Strategies will be abolished if the Localism Bill becomes law, as is expected at the end of the year - it is in its final stages of its passage through Parliament. This was the bone of contention Colonnade had with the original Coombes Farm refusal, and how they manged to eventually get the decision quashed.

Colonnade's Lawyers successfully challenged Eric Pickles' addendum to the Planning Inspector's original refusal. This was because Mr Pickles' had stated that Planning Inspectors could effectively ignore Regional Strategy legislation forthwith, due to the Government planning to abolish the same in its Localism Bill legislation. A High Court Judge originally ruled that this was illegal because legislation had to be passed to abolish Regional Strategies. However, it was later ruled that it made sense, especially when considering large development plans which may be phased over a number of years, that Planning Inspectors, when making a decision, should have an eye to any soon to be introduced legislation (in this case "The Localism Bill")

This latest clarification may also help the Council to get its Core Strategy finally approved by the Planning Inspector. A decision had been expected around now, but the Council asked for it to be delayed to take account of the High Court decision, and also to allow it to undertake some further work to demonstrate that all options had been properly considered in relation to new housing locations.

For me, this latest legal ruling doesn't bring the legal clarity I would have wished. It isn't bold or strong enough enough to end the endless legal challenges. Expect to see Colonnade try to get a second full Inquiry into Coombes Farm as their Lawyers try to find a hole in the Council documentation supporting their original refusal, as well as their ongoing challenges to national policy. Remember, Colonnade's QC, and the QC who has been in the High Court recently appearing for Cala Homes is one and the same.

Coombes Farm - why we're in this mess

Edited from an earlier post, but remains pertinent.

If Eric Pickles had not issued his letter, supporting the Planning Inspector's refusal, and directing Planning Authorities that Regional Strategies are revoked with immediate effect, and the same letter to be regarded as material weight in decisions on planning matters, we would not be in this limbo period and, most importantly, Colonnade's plans would be no longer.

That's because the Planning Inspector refused Colonnade for a number of reasons, most signifcantly due to the land being designated green belt. She made no reference to Eric Pickles' letter. That came with a supporting document, in addition to her own decision, from the Secretary of State. However, the two documents form the whole refusal, and it was enough for Colonnade's legal team to seize upon as one of the reasons for its appeal for Judicial Review, and subsequent success in getting the consent order from the High Court to quash the planning decision (refusal) of 22nd July 2010.

Moreover, the now infamous "Eric Pickles' letter" is the subject of ongoing High Court Action by Cala Homes, effectively on behalf of various national developers, including Colonnade (Peter Village QC acts for Cala, as he did for Colonnade).

If Eric had kept quiet it would probably be game over for Colonnade. We would not be here in this period of uncertainty, two years after plans were first submitted. The Planning Inspector gave sound and robust reasons for refusing Colonnade, which should withstand any Judicial Review. So much for the new Government's proposals for planning issues! It hasn't helped Coombes Farm at all. In fact, quite the opposite as it's kept Colonnade's candle flickering for a little while longer. Eric, this is not a good start. You were given poor advice and the result is an impression of incompetence and rubbish decison making.

Coombes Farm to be re-determined

Copy of email sent to Coombes Farm supporters today, click on the heading for a copy of the letter from the Secretary of State;

Dear All,

In case you haven't received directly, I attach a letter, received today, confirming the Government's intention to redetermine the Coombes Farm planning application, following the original decision being quashed last year.

Key points are;

Submissions are invited only on the points which led to the Quashing in the first place - ie not issues relating to green belt and other matters raised in the Inquiry - these should still be valid, but issues relating to this Government's intention to abolish Regional Strategies, and any other significant changes since the original Planning Appeal.

Submissions are in writing only, but there is a chance that there will be a re-run of the Planning Inquiry.

What people really want to know is, does this mean the development at Coombes Farm could take place? My view, and that of key Councillors, is that the arguments heard by the Planning Inspector have not changed, but sadly until, or if, we receive the document that confirms refusal, nothing is certain I'm afraid.

How long will it take? No definite answer on this - it could be 3 months, or longer than a year, depending on various different, but related, pieces of legislation making their way through the Courts and Parliament.

What can we do? I will respond to the letter, stating that the Planning Inspector came to the right decision, and that it is a pity that her letter was covered by a letter from the Secretary of State saying that Planning Inspectors could take into account future legislation ("The Localism Bill") The letter stated that, in determining planning applications, Councils would no longer be bound by housing targets and other matters defined in existing Regional Strategies (in Rochford's case, the East of England plan), and that a rewording of his letter is all that is required. The legal standing of this letter has been the subject of a number of High Court challenges, still ongoing. If people wish to respond as well - in a similar vein, or with their own points, it can only help - the address, etc, is on the attached letter.

Our Councillors are aware of the strength of feeling on this matter, but it would do no harm to raise any concerns you have with them directly.

Regards,

James

Local Elections May 2011

The turnout for this year's local elections was disappointingly poor. In my central Rochford ward just 34% of people could be bothered to vote. What surprised me most was this percentage was barely higher than Milton Ward in central Southend, where I lived for a while previously and, by comparison to Rochford, a far more diverse and less cohesive community. I just didn't expect Rochford to be as disenfranchised as one of the poorest parts of Southend. What sits behind this level of dispondency? Is it that, with the exception of a couple of Independents, Conservative dominate the Council, and there is a belief that one vote will not make any difference and, anyway, the Conservatives do a reasonable job in running the Council. If it ain't broke..etc. I tried to keep an open mind towards the elections, and read all the campaigning literature that came through the door. It would have been nice to meet some of the candidates as well, though none called. What struck me is that some of the proposals put forward would cost a gigantic sum of money that we know isn't available to spend. It was difficult therefore to take some of the Candidates' wish lists seriously. For example, one Candidate mentioned the building of a bypass to take the pressure of Ashingdon Road. Yes, we know the roads in the district are congested for many hours each day, but realistically we know that it's a bonus if the potholes are repaired. I don't personally believe we are likely to see any significant road schemes in the District for many years, and I'm not sure that they would even be desirable (Southend bypass?) However, just because there is a lack of cash, I strongly believe that should not be an excuse for making improvements in the area where possible. I believe there are a number of opportunities, some outlined in this Blog already, which could improve Residents' lives which would cost the Council very little. Realistic, imaginative, and attractive proposals are the way to get people on board in my view, and ensure the District moves forward from 1965.

Musings

There hasn't been too much Planning activity in recent weeks due to the forthcoming local elections. In this lead up period controversial decisons and announcements are avoided. The core strategy is currently with the Planning Inspector for final sign off, and we won't formally know until May whether this is legally compliant and therefore finalised. Privately, I'm sure certain Council officials will have a good idea before then, however. If signed off, you can expect the planning application for 600 houses between Hall Road and Ironwell Lane to quickly go before Planning Committee, as the core strategy does support development in this location. The prospect of this development appalls me, I know of no one locally who is in favour of attractive green belt land being sacrificed for an ugly housing estate, the result of which will add to our already congested roads and generally urbanise what is currently an attractive semi rural area. With three District Councillors currently standing for re-election, I hope Residents are making their feelings known to them, and asking them what their voting intentions are likely to be when the proposals are voted on. Like Coombes Farm, which isn't quite "saved" yet, Hall Rd is an example of a development which would cause permanent harm to the character of Rochford. You only need to look at Rayleigh, and compare the town now to how it was thirty years ago to see how bleak the future for Rochford could be. This area is at full capacity, so the Council and the Government should reject this application, and look to other parts of the county and country, where development is sparse, to spread the load. The intention of the new Localism Bill is to allow local decision making. This Bill is currently passing through Parliament and is likely to law by the end of the year. Then, hopefully, the Council can no longer use the excuse that they have centralised housing targets forced on them.

There are indications that these austere times are affecting Rochford. I noticed "Simply Shoes" has closed on the square. I hope the shop doesn't remain vacant for too long and, please, not another charity shop.

Looks like there are no longer four Indian Resturants in Rochford as the Royal Tandoori, West St, looked very empty and dark as I walked past last night.

Still no buyer for the King's Head it seems, though a new caretaker Manager has the pub open full time again. Shame about the broken windows though.

Local Elections May 2011

A third of our local Councillors are standing for re-election this May. During the campaigning period, which unoffically starts this week, key announcements and decisions are often delayed until after the elections, the reason we won't have a clearer idea about the sign off of the core strategy and, possibly, the outcome of Coombes Farm until May. Slightly frustrating, especially when you consider that it's likely to be a shoe in for at least one of the District Councillors who has stood unopposed in previous campaigns. I've touched before on the dominance of the Conservatives in Rochford, and certainly it's difficult to argue that we don't have one of the most well run local Authorities in the country. But is this status quo the will of the people or apathy? - especially when, as sadly is the case throughout the country, Councillors elected will probably only have a third of the electorate behind them if they're lucky. More to follow.

Coombes Farm - positive developments

As the linked article (click on title) from the Echo summarises, Colonnade are on the back foot now. I've sought some clarification from the Council about the status of the planning application and what happens next. The planning decision was quashed due to Eric Pickles' letter, the one advising of the proposed abolition of Regional Strategies, not the Government Inspector's refusal (Christine Thorby). In principle, therefore, the Government Inspector's decision can still be relied on, and it is only a case of "un quashing". The latest High Court decision says that it's rational for house builders to have an eye on incoming plannning legislation, even if not formally legislated. The bottom line is that it's possible for this application to be redetermined and refused without a second planning Inquiry. A couple of hurdles to overcome yet, the High Court decision may be successfully challenged and the Council's Core Strategy, which does not support the Coombes Farm development, is yet to be signed off. But, one way or another, we should have a conclusion by May, and it's all looking a lot more encouraging.

Coming to a screen in Rochford?

I've considered for some time how suitable Rochford is for a community film event. We have many potentially suitable venues, and such an event would be ideal for those who are unable to get to, or find it prohibitive, Southend, or other cinema "endowed" towns. I'm thinking of exhibiting films which have popular appeal and would hopefully ensure a good attendance, but who knows how it could pan out if it proves to be successful. It would be great, for example, if it was possible to devote some time to local interest film in addition to the "main feature". For now, it's very early days, but at the outset I believe it's essential to focus on ensuring such a project is financially sustainable. I've had initial discussions with The White Bus, based in North Rd, Southend, who are a community group specialising in all things film - production, exhibitions, etc, and they are supportive of provding an event in Rochford. I've also started making enquiries to potential venues. If anyone has any suggestions, or wants to help get this project off the ground, I'd be pleased to hear from you jamesbowker@gmail.com

Coombes Farm - High Court win supports battle

The Government has today won a High Court case against Cala Homes, a national house builder trying to build up to 2000 homes at Barton Farm in Winchester. Today's ruling will have ramifications for house builders and affected communities around the country. Judge Lindblom ruled that the proposed abolition of Regional Strategies, in Rochford's case "The East of England plan" and adoption of the Localism Bill CAN be a material consideration when considering planning applications, such as Coombes Farm. This ruling helps the battle for Coombes Farm, as it was the uncertainty over the future of Regional Strategies which Colonnade seized upon to secure their eventual quashing of the planning appeal decision. We now wait to hear how and when the Coombes Farm application will be re-determined, but the case against development is strengthened in this rollercoaster ride. I expect that Cala Homes will appeal the High Court decision however.

Terling - a lesson for Rochford?

Slightly off topic this post, for a start it isn't even about Rochford, but bear with me. We took a drive on this winter's, windswept overcast Sunday afternoon into the wilds of Essex and happened upon an extremely beautiful, small village called Terling. It's to the South East of Great Leighs, and North East of Boreham. It really is off the beaten track, in a triangle of unspoilt rural countryside.

However, like so many villages these days, which have had the heart ripped out of them through the closure of key facilities - the pub, the post office, and the village store, Terling is, sadly, no exception. Whilst it has a village store, the village pub, "The Terling Inn" is boarded up, and up for sale for circa £575k.

Yet, we noticed posters around the village, proclaiming "Save our Pub" and inviting residents to a meeting to discuss plans to restore the facility. I hope they succeed of course. It's worked elsewhere, "The Norton" in Cold Norton springs to mind, and the bar in South Fambridge continues to trade through volunteer support.

The barriers to success will be the cost of buying the building, and the number of potential customers (the village population is circa 750).

But I wonder why the pub closed in the first place? I guess, obviously, people stopped visiting, but why? Was the service poor, the beer poorly kept, the food options limited? Running a pub must seem a thankless task at times, but you don't need to drive far to see some good examples still trading successfully, despite sometimes being located in the middle of nowhere.

Maybe "The Terling Inn" closed because people stopped going, but, possibly, if the offering had been more compelling it would still be trading successfully in the 21st century?

Combes Farm - Iceni's threats of legal action

Anyone who is interested in the latest developments on Coombes Farm should follow the correspondence between Iceni Projects, Rochford District Council, and the Government Inspector responsible for the continued core strategy hearings which have taken place this week. (click on the title of this post to take you to the relevant page on the Council's website) Iceni, on behalf of Colonnade, has presented a Freedom of Information request to the Council for all documentation relating to their evidence base and audit trail in reaching their conclusions on, in particular, the location of housing requirements in the years ahead. The number of documents requested seems ridiculously lengthy and indicates an increasing desperation on Colonnade's part, especially since their efforts to make further representations at the Core Strategy were rebuffed by the Government Inspector. Iceni has threatened to legally challenge the Core Strategy, if found to be sound, if time is not allowed for it to present what it considers to be further crucial evidence. In addition to the Core Strategy hearings, the High Court will, on 7th February, give its Judgment on whether the new Government's decision to abolish Regional Strategies before passing its Localism Bill can be taken into consideration in planning decisions made in this "void" between old and new legislation.

Rochford's battle to get its core strategy approved

Our Council's efforts to get their core strategy finalised and signed off by the Government continue this week. The core strategy, which is essentially a local development framework for the next 15 years, has faced stiff opposition in previous hearings and it's almost become something of a David and Goliath battle, with Rochford taking the role of the little man. Whilst the Council's plans are wide ranging, the issue which is causing the greatest controversy is housing, and accompanying this, the need to give up green belt as there are insufficient brownfield sites in the area. Some of the loudest noises in opposition are land owners who would lose out if the Council succeeds, but also residents groups who would be affected by new development on previously farmed land. Most affected would be those living along Hall Rd (as some development to the West of the town centre is supported). Bellway Homes has plans for 600 homes on currently farmed land between Hall Road and Ironwell Lane. Yet, whilst the core strategy rules out significant development to the East (with the notable exception of Stambridge Mill, where redevelopment is being delayed apparently due to issues relating to flood prevention) Colonnade have been a strong presence at the core strategy hearings in relation to the Coombes Farm development. They naturally want to see the Council fail as it will reopen their chances of securing planning consent, when the planning application is finally redetermined.

To add to the mix, Basildon District Council also opposes Rochford's plans. That's because Basildon believes the onus has been placed on them to take a major share of the new housing requirement in the East of England area plans.

Winers and losers...

I believe the single factor which will determine whether or not the Council succeeds will be whether the Government Inspector agrees that their evidence base, to support their conclusions on housing numbers, stands up under scutiny.

When the new Government took office and announced that they intended to abolish Labour's Regional Strategies legislation, which included building a certain number of new homes within a certain period of time, Rochford took the opportunity to revise downwards the number of new homes they proposed to build annually, although the actual total would be unchanged. (They just would take a few more years to get there).

Because the new Government has been taken to the High Court (by Cala Homes) and been found to be acting illegally in abolish Regional Strategies without an Act of Parliament, the current status is that the previous Governments legislation remains in place. The Coalition's Localism Bill will eventually revoke existing legislation, and recently received its second reading. However, Rochford will have to show its new housing numbers remain compliant with the existing East of England plan (the Regional Strategy for our area) but it gets more complicated yet...

The High Court heard yet further hearings regarding the Coalition's proposed abolishment of Regional Strategies on the 17th January, and a Judgment is expected imminently on whether Councils can legally take into account that proposed legislation, currently passing through the House of Commons, will annnul the existing housing numbers regime.

Accordingly, the Planning Inspector at the core strategy hearings will also have an eye to the High Court when considering her conclusions.

Most expect this all to drag on for several more months.

Local Heritage Assets in Rochford and Executive Decision Making

The Council assesses buildings in the District for their architectural merit, affording them the title "Local Heritage Asset" where appropriate. In a sense it's a localised version of the National Listed Building status system, although the protection provided is not so strong.

The categorizations are recorded in the "Local List Supplementary Planning Document", you can access it by clicking on the title of this post, but be warned it's 13Mb in size. If you have any problems, you can also follow this link to the Council's website - you need to select the document attaching to the 17th January meeting http://cmis.rochford.gov.uk/cmiswebpublic/CalendarEvents.aspx. I found it very interesting. Basically, a traffic light system has been used - green for LHA (Local Heritage Asset) recommendation, or red, if not. There will always be some anomalies, for example the Shepherd & Dog (Ballards Gore), Victory Inn (Ashingdon), and Castle Pub (Little Wakering) have a similar architectural design, all were early twentieth century built road house type public houses, the first to cater for motorists by providing dedicated car parking. Yet some are given protection and others (The Castle) are not. Similarly, some of the buildings in Rochford's Market Square are given the green light, while others, of a similar age, are not.

It's very arbitrary, but when you consider the decision on "red" or "green" appears to be down to just two people, you can understand why.

It also appears to have been compiled in a bit of a rush, as it's a document that's required for the resumed core strategy hearings at the start of February.

Have a look at the document and see if you agree with the findings. If you do not, however, it's tough luck as it doesn't appear to have been widely publicised and there were only a few days to appeal from the date of publication, 19th January!

Rochford flooding January 18th 2011

Not the worst that Rochford's seen, though the Roach breached its banks at several points over the past couple of days, the A127 was partially closed and Watery Lane completely so for a period. With drier conditions now set in, the waters will have peaked for now. These photos are from across Rochford, the car park at the Horse and Groom, Rochford Reservoir, Coombes Farm, and Cherry Orchard Park.

Roach Valley (no) Way

Taken near Watts Lane - no one's going to be using this path for a while.

Rochford Reservoir flooding

Cherry Orchard - more rain soaked pictures

Close to flooding at Cherry Orchard Park

As these photos evidence, the recent downpours are beginning to take their toll. These photos were taken today at the footbridge at the bottom of the footpath which leads to Gusted Hall lane, and mark an amazing upsurge from yesterday afternoon, when we were both taking a fighting-against-the-elements afternoon stroll. Fortunately, the forecast suggests we're heading for a drier interlude. The "man made" lake has temporarily enlarged and extended, almost to the point where the excess water is draining into the adjacent river. However, there's always a winner, and the birdlife are taking full advantage of their expanding habitat.

6 miles across Cherry Orchard Park

I'm a reasonably keen walker and jogger, and Rochford offers excellent opportunities for both, although lack of day light and damp, water logged ground offer a challenge at this time of the year. I thought it could be worthwhile documenting some of the runs and walks, starting with this 6 mile run. It starts in the Market square in central Rochford, and finishes at Ironwell Lane, junction with Ashingdon Road.

Wherever possible, I try to avoid heavy traffic, it just makes running more of a grind. This run involves some soft ground, the route passes through woods at Gusted Hall, and along Ironwell Lane - both unmade. Despite the heavy rains, I managed to avoid a bootfall when I ran the route at the weekend, though caution is required.

The route is easy to follow. When heading South along Hall Rd, you need to take the underpass into Cherry Orchard Park at the first roundabout. Stay on the path which follows the edge of Jubilee Park until the very end, when it exits onto Green Lane. Turn right onto Green Lane, and follow until you reach Fleming Farm Rd (you can zoom into the map to obtain greater detail). Follow Fleming Farm Rd, a single tracked tarmaced road, past open fields and farm buildings until the very end, and turn right, when the road becomes a byway. You will reach a footbridge across a stream, and follow straight ahead, and up, through Gusted Hall woods. After approx 400 yards, you will exit the woods and pick up the route at Gusted Hall Lane. The remainder of the route should be able to be followed from the map.

Council Democracy - Use it or lose it

What have Australia, Argentina and the Democratic Republic of Congo got in common and why am I using these countries as a theme for this post? All three countries, and there are others, employ a system of compulsory voting, where every adult has to vote and are fined if they do not do so. In an ideal world, you would think that having the democratic right to choose who best represents your views in Government would be cherished. Most people have heard of Emily Pankhurst's suffragette movement to secure equal rights for women. In the UK, perhaps in search of this ideal world, it remains up to the individual whether or not he can be bothered to turn up at the ballot box. But sometimes I wonder if we wouldn't be a better, more cohesive, society, if people were made to care a little more. Perhaps a system of compulsory voting would force people to take an interest in what is happening around them, and then maybe it's why Governments have shied away from putting compulsory voting on the political agenda. With 100% of the eligible electorate voting, it really would put Politicans under the spotlight and encourage greater accountability. As it stands, however, the recent by election in Oldham suggests that people remain as sceptical as ever towards politics and politicians, with a turn out of just 48%, down from 61% in May's general election.

In Rochford, our Councillors go to some lengths to ensure accountability and accessibility. Apart from speaking to your Councillor directly, regular public meetings are held throughout the Rochford District where the public can attend and ask questions about almost any subject of concern to them. These are known as Area Committees and are presently split geographically, East (Rochford and surrounds), Central (Hawkwell) and West (Rayleigh) and are held in Libraries, Public Halls and Churches on a 2 to 3 month frequency. Hypocritically, I've only attended a couple in recent months, and have raised issues concerning Coombes Farm, rubbish on paths along the Roach Valley and at Rochford station. Others have raised subjects including crime and planning issues. Representatives from the Police, Health Service, and Essex County Council often also attend to provide an update of their services, and answer residents' questions.

It is a great facility available to the community, yet the attendance figures suggest few people are aware that they take place or, if they are, uninterested in showing up. The Council, aware of this, and looking to make savings where they can, have undertaken a review of Area Committeee and the Council's Executive will decide next week, whether to act on the recommendation to change the shape and form of these forums altogether. Whilst the meetings will not be as accessible as previously, the proposal appears to focus on just Rayleigh and Rochford as future venues, the aim is to make them more user friendly in format. The name will change to Community Forum, and the intention is to make them less formal, yet still provide residents with a face to face opportunity to get a direct answer to their parking frustration, or youth nuisance issue, or whatever.

I hope this new format is supported by us residents, and indeed I hope the Council promote it widely. An announcement on the Rochford District Council website is not sufficient. I know, from my own experiences with the Coombes Farm campaign, that you need to go door to door when you want to get the message across. Another factor, is that the Council are under no legal obligation to hold these forums, and many other Districts do not provide such a facility. So, if the Council do their bit, and the invitations are extended, I hope that we will accept. Otherwise, within a very short space of time, they may cease altogether, and it really will only be us to blame for the loss of a valuable local democratic resource.

New Ship flats - beware the precedents UPDATED 21st Jan 2011

A scheme that had previously been rejected by Rochford District Council's planning committee returns in a slightly revised format, and this time is being recommended for approval. The new owners of the New Ship Inn, which is undergoing a lengthy refurbishment, have applied for permission to demolish a dilapidated garage building on the site and construct a two storey structure in its place to provide five one bedroomed flats. It appears the existing car park will be used as part of the development. Council Officers believe the new scheme will blend in with the existing street scene, and cite more modern developments in East Street - Saxon Place and Glenmore House, as precedents for existing flatted developments, one of their main reasons for recommending approval. If anyone feels strongly about these proposals, you can attend the Development Control meeting on 20th January at the Council's Civic Suite in Rayleigh.

UPDATE: Councillors have voted against the Planning Officers' recommendation and refused the application. No doubt this will now go to appeal.